[Fwd: [PATCH] bzr tracks permissions]

[Robert Collins]

On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 16:41 -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> 
> I agree with this, but I think it's worth at least exploring the idea
> of
> accomplishing this by subjecting all these properties to a single,
> unified system. 

So do I. My discussion with Gustavo revolved around whether we should do
executable bit support before or after the GUT :). I strongly suspect
there is enough commonality to break down what we deal with into user
properties, intrinsic properties etc, and merge can deal with those
sets.

I'm strongly inclined to defer that though, until we've got things like
weave merge well integrated, as that will provide a bunch of information
on how different merge logic needs to access such things.

Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20050923/9168a9ce/attachment.pgp