Centralized Storage, round 2

[Jan Hudec]

On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 16:54:55 +0200, Erik B?gfors wrote:
> I just wanted to second Aaron here.  I'd like to move my company over
> to bzr at some point. And a central storage is a big plus.  Right now
> when using subversion, as soon as someone does a commit, everyone can
> access it and we can do "svn copy trunk branches/branch1" and EVERYONE
> can use branch1 directly.

In this particular case, I prefer to have the commit stored locally and
pushed to the master in a post-commit. Kind of what svk does with
subversion. Reason being, that even fast LAN can't beat local access
(when accessing the history).

That would benefit from multi-head support for the master (so you don't
have to merge everything immediately).

--
						 Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb at ucw.cz>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20050918/58c54788/attachment.pgp