rfc: remove "revision specs"

[Martin Pool]

On 9/2/05, Jan Hudec <bulb at ucw.cz> wrote:
> The plain file/http/... is appropriate iff the resource can be reasonably
> accessed by normal ("dumb fs") client for that protocol.
> 
> That said I start to think that file:// and http:// and sftp:// are
> appropriate, but the later two only if they don't use special server.
> 
> Ie.  http is appropriate if normal GET is used to obtain the data files, but
> if a special POST to bazaar-specific CGI is used, the scheme should be
> bzr+http. Similarly if standard sftp server is used, sftp is appropriate, but
> if it actually spawns bzr over ssh, it should be bzr+ssh scheme.

Yes, I agree.  At the moment the plan is to use http and sftp, but I
can see a place for bzr+ssh sometime.

-- 
Martin