rfc: remove "revision specs"

[Jan Hudec]

On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 09:52:22 +0200, Denys Duchier wrote:
> Jan Hudec <bulb at ucw.cz> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 01:28:02 +0300, Nir Soffer wrote:
> >> I don't see why the fragment would be ignored by the web application, 
> >> while the parameter will not.
> >
> > So *try* it if you don't believe. If you enter URL with fragment in browser
> > url-bar, the fragment will *not* become part of the request, so the web
> > application does not have a chance to give it another meaning than scrolling
> > to an <a name="fragment"> tag. That's how fragments are defined in the rfc
> > and how they are meant to be.
> 
> er... while Robert's point was quite correct about the stipulation that fragment
> processing should happen in the user-agent, it is not the case that fragments
> must be limited to identifying elements in an html document, nor that the
> user-agent must be a "web browser".

No, but consistency with bzrweb (and/or other web access tools) was mentioned
as good to have -- and bzrweb has a web browser as client.

--
						 Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb at ucw.cz>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20050831/251ca317/attachment.pgp