rfc: remove "revision specs"
robertc at robertcollins.net
Tue Aug 30 23:36:57 BST 2005
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 01:28 +0300, Nir Soffer wrote:
> On 31 Aug, 2005, at 1:17, Robert Collins wrote:
> > Well fragment is meant to refer to a label within a non varying
> > content.
> > Getting a different entity back requires parameterisation - query part
> > or url parameters.
> Do you have reference for that?
See my reply to Denys - fragment processing is done entirely in the user
> > For instance, the dir part parameter I'm proposing is
> > usable (in principale - not right now) by bzrweb to show the correct
> > revision, whereas a fragment would not be visible to the web server and
> > would be ignored.
> I don't see why the fragment would be ignored by the web application,
> while the parameter will not.
Because # is never transmitted to the server.
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20050831/d3e419fa/attachment.pgp
More information about the bazaar