plans for 0.0.6 release

[Michael Ellerman]

On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 16:22, John A Meinel wrote:
> It would be nice to have the revision separator worked out before
> reaching a sort of milestone release. But that is pretty minimal.
>
> If we have the revision separator, I think getting "bzr diff" to support
> doing a diff against 2 revisions is pretty trivial. Since you at least
> merged the -r 10:20 patch, you probably could do the bzr diff -r 10:20
> patch.

Well if "-r 10:20" goes in to 0.0.6 I'll definitely have to fork bzr. Should I 
call it OpenBzr or FreeBzr? I've got it! NoColonsHereBzr! ;D

I've got a half finished patch to handle 10:20, 10-20 10 to 20 etc. so I think 
it's fine for 10:20 to go in as long as we can add the other formats later. 
I'm not keen on the {date:foo} stuff though.

The automatic base-finding (or whatever it's called) for merge would be nice, 
merge is seriously un-user friendly without it.

There's a couple of ExternalCommands patches which should go in I think:
[PATCH] Fix external commands with --diff-options
[PATCH] Better error checking for external commands

And I liked my patch to make recurse auto-add unversioned parents, which I 
forwarded to you called "Re: bzr add and recurse".

cheers

-- 
Michael Ellerman
IBM OzLabs

email: michael:ellerman.id.au
inmsg: mpe:jabber.org
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)

We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20050601/68f3782e/attachment.pgp