git and bzr

[Sean Russell]

On Friday 29 April 2005 20:31, Erik Bågfors wrote:
> > We can't check out?
>
> Nope, that's rsync for now :)

Hm.  So, what's the difference?   Practically, if not functionally?  What I 
mean is, isn't a bzr co going to end up being an rsync in the end anyway?  
However, I wasn't aware that the 'co' command hadn't been implemented yet.  I 
assume that it isn't going to use the same mechanism as update, which will 
have to be eventually able to handle cherry-picking.

-- 
### SER   
### Deutsch|Esperanto|Francaise|Linux|XML|Ruby|Haskell|Java|Aikido
### http://www.ser1.net       jabber.com:ser  ICQ:83578737 
### GPG: http://www.ser1.net/Security/ser_public.gpg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20050430/5b370de1/attachment.pgp