mbp at sourcefrog.net
Wed Mar 23 06:04:45 GMT 2005
David I. Lehn wrote:
> Just came across bazaar-ng. Looks like a nice direction for a source
> control system. Looks like a nice melding of features from bitkeeper,
> arch, and subversion.
And darcs, and a couple more..
> If nothing else, the docs summarize some nice
> things that other systems should look at. I do however question the
> overuse of projects using *-ng naming. ;)
I sympathize, but the guy with the checkbook chose the name. :-) Call
it bzr if you prefer.
> Couple problems I've got now. First is that when checking out with tla
> there's a sig checking problem at patch-365:
> INVALID SIGNATURE ON REVISION!
> archive: mbp at sourcefrog.net--2004
> revision bazaar-ng--0--patch-365
> checksum file: checksum.cacherev
> Had to just disable checking to get past that.
It seems to work for me. Maybe you have an old version of tla? In the
meantime I suggest you just get the tarball.
> Running the tutorial I hit a time.localtime() bug during my first
> commit. Looks like None is passed in rather than no params. That's
> puking on Python 2.3.5.
Yes, just a python 2.3 compatability problem; should be fixed soon.
> And it seems running that commit a few times actually puts new commit
> files in .bzr even though there are no real changes.
Yes; this should be fixed I suppose to refuse to commit no changes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20050323/3ef06b58/attachment.pgp
More information about the bazaar