some bugs

[Martin Pool]

David I. Lehn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just came across bazaar-ng.  Looks like a nice direction for a source
> control system.  Looks like a nice melding of features from bitkeeper,
> arch, and subversion.

And darcs, and a couple more..


 > If nothing else, the docs summarize some nice
> things that other systems should look at.  I do however question the
> overuse of projects using *-ng naming. ;)

I sympathize, but the guy with the checkbook chose the name. :-)  Call
it bzr if you prefer.

> Couple problems I've got now.  First is that when checking out with tla
> there's a sig checking problem at patch-365:
>
> INVALID SIGNATURE ON REVISION!
>   archive: mbp at sourcefrog.net--2004
>   revision bazaar-ng--0--patch-365
>   checksum file: checksum.cacherev
>
> Had to just disable checking to get past that.

It seems to work for me.  Maybe you have an old version of tla?  In the
meantime I suggest you just get the tarball.

> Running the tutorial I hit a time.localtime() bug during my first
> commit.  Looks like None is passed in rather than no params.  That's
> puking on Python 2.3.5.

Yes, just a python 2.3 compatability problem; should be fixed soon.

> And it seems running that commit a few times actually puts new commit
> files in .bzr even though there are no real changes.

Yes; this should be fixed I suppose to refuse to commit no changes
unless forced.

Welcome!

--
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20050323/3ef06b58/attachment.pgp