[apparmor] [RFC] Refactoring apparmor-profiles repository

[Vincas Dargis]

On 6/14/18 10:22 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> Your idea about apparmor/2.13,
> apparmor/2.12 is interesting. I suspect there will be some duplication
> there too, but I'm not terribly about it.

Yes there will be duplication for the packages that ships updates in 
stable versions (like Thunderbird and Firefox), while AppArmor 
abstractions are not being upgraded. That's the main point of basing on 
AppArmor versions - for clearly defining available abstractions (and 
their update) and for policy features/versions, that profiles depend 
heavily on.