[apparmor] Signed-off-by: (was: Re: [patch] Fix a test name in test-signal.py)

[Steve Beattie]

[Resurrecting old emails for fun and profit.]

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:39:27PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Another (IMHO more interesting) question is if we should recommend GPG 
> signed mails for patches, ACKs and NAKs (to make things easier: for all 
> mails). That's something that can't be faked easily and ensures the 
> integrity of the patch and mail content. (As you can see in this mail, I 
> have a GPG key and attended some keysigning parties ;-)

One difficulty with requiring GPG signed emails for patches is that
'quilt mail' doesn't do signed emails. You can have it save the
messages to an mbox file to send manually, but when I've done that, it
requires manual effort to ensure all the email references are correct
so that the quilt patch series shows up as a single email thread.

But in general, it'd be a good thing if ACKs and NACKs were GPG signed.
(I send all messages signed by default, except where things like quilt
prevent me from doing so or where it's known to cause problems for the
receiver.)

-- 
Steve Beattie
<sbeattie at ubuntu.com>
http://NxNW.org/~steve/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/apparmor/attachments/20160106/11059fb9/attachment.pgp>