[Vote] Postman
Ed .
schumifer at hotmail.com
Sat Oct 13 15:32:12 UTC 2012
Hi,
I removed the logos from the package altogether. I re-uploaded as version 0.3.3.
Regards,
Ed
> Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 10:05:20 +0200
> From: david.planella at ubuntu.com
> To: schumifer at hotmail.com
> CC: app-review-board at lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: Re: [Vote] Postman
>
> Al 06/10/12 08:35, En/na Ed . ha escrit:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > I've had a quick look at flickr
> > (http://www.flickr.com/services/api/tos/) and apparently to use the
> > flickr logo in an app, explicit written permission is required from
> > them. A simple copyright adjustment will not suffice.
> >
> > I haven't looked into the other services but I wouldn't be surprised if
> > their requirements are similar.
> >
>
> Hi Ed,
>
> Thanks for looking into this. In that case, do you think you could
> research how you can use each service's logos and contact the copyright
> holders to get permission if necessary?
>
> Once that's been sorted we can then publish Postman on the Software Center.
>
> Alternatively, would it not be possible to create your own version of
> the logos?
>
> Cheers,
> David.
>
> >
> >
> >> Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 05:56:11 +0200
> >> From: david.planella at ubuntu.com
> >> To: app-review-board at lists.ubuntu.com
> >> CC: schumifer at hotmail.com
> >> Subject: Re: [Vote] Postman
> >>
> >> Al 02/10/12 10:20, En/na Bhavani Shankar R ha escrit:
> >> > On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Bhavani Shankar R
> > <bhavi at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:10 PM, David Planella
> >> >> <david.planella at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> >> >>> Al 21/09/12 00:24, En/na Andrew Mitchell ha escrit:
> >> >>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:54:18AM +0200, David Planella wrote:
> >> >>>>> Al 03/09/12 16:04, En/na Bhavani Shankar R ha escrit:
> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Ed . <schumifer at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>> If I understood the Lintian error correctly, it should be
> > fixed now.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Regards,
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Ed
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> The short description seems good now
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Thanks Ed!
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Regards,
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Hi all,
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> In one of the monthly conversations with the Consumer Apps (CA)
> > team to
> >> >>>>> promote Open Source apps as banners in the Software Centre, I
> > suggested
> >> >>>>> having Postman as our new featured app.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> It currently simply needs 2 votes to be approved and then published.
> >> >>>>> I've also noticed I can no longer find it in the MyApps queue
> > [1]. Has
> >> >>>>> it been deleted?
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> @ARB: could you help with the 2 remaining reviews and votes?
> >> >>>>> @Ed: could you give us the URL to Postman in MyApps, or resubmit
> > it if
> >> >>>>> you've deleted it?
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Thanks.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Cheers,
> >> >>>>> David.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> [1] https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/arb/
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> It looks like it's been resubmitted as
> > https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/apps/1612/
> >> >>>> I've grabbed the source package from the PPA & it mostly looks
> > good, the only
> >> >>>> concerns I have at the moment are the copyright on the logos for
> > the various
> >> >>>> services, as they each have their own terms of use for how the
> > logos are
> >> >>>> used, and copyright on logos such as these should be detailed in
> >> >>>> debian/copyright.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks a lot Andrew.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> From your review, do you think you could you list which logos are
> >> >>> missing copyright and how they should be listed in the
> > debian/copyright
> >> >>> file?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Ed might or might not be familiar with Debian packaging, and I think a
> >> >>> hint on how to do this would help unblocking the review and getting
> >> >>> Postman into the Software Center.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks!
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >> Hey David,
> >> >>
> >> >> All the logos after resubmission, should be listed according to their
> >> >> licenses in d/copyright
> >> >>
> >> >> This link will help out on the same (I havent looked at the
> >> >> resubmitted package though)
> >> >>
> >> >>
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#examples
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Just took a look at the package in detail
> >> >
> >> > I think the logos and icons Andrew was referring to was (Please
> >> > correct me if I'm wrong)
> >> >
> >> > -rw-r--r-- root/root 9743 2012-09-02 02:27
> >> > ./opt/extras.ubuntu.com/postman/share/postman/media/picasaLogo.png
> >> > -rw-r--r-- root/root 3054 2012-09-02 02:27
> >> > ./opt/extras.ubuntu.com/postman/share/postman/media/ubuntuOneLogo.png
> >> > -rw-r--r-- root/root 11115 2012-09-02 02:27
> >> > ./opt/extras.ubuntu.com/postman/share/postman/media/googlePlusLogo.png
> >> > -rw-r--r-- root/root 1966 2012-09-02 02:27
> >> > ./opt/extras.ubuntu.com/postman/share/postman/media/flickrLogo.png
> >> >
> >> > Regarding g+ logo usage you can name the author name as google
> >> > corporation and you can use something of this sort
> >> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Google%2B_logo.png and can be stated
> >> > under public domain I guess (in d/copyright)
> >> >
> >> > Same goes with Ubuntu one, flickr and picasa I guess.
> >> >
> >> > As I said earlier, Andrew: Please correct me if I'm wrong here
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> Ed, does this give you enough information on what files you should
> >> provide copyright info for and how to do it?
> >>
> >> It'd be great if you could update the copyright info, so that we can
> >> publish Postman and start promoting it in the Software Center.
> >>
> >> Let us know if you need help.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> David.
> >>
>
>
> --
> David Planella
> Ubuntu Translations Coordinator
> www.ubuntu.com / www.davidplanella.wordpress.com
> www.identi.ca/dplanella / www.twitter.com/dplanella
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/app-review-board/attachments/20121013/79ed3b56/attachment.html>
More information about the App-review-board
mailing list