<html> <head> <style></style></head> <body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Hi,<div> </div><div>I removed the logos from the package altogether. I re-uploaded as version 0.3.3.</div><div> </div><div> </div><div>Regards,</div><div> </div><div>Ed <div><div id="SkyDrivePlaceholder"></div>> Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 10:05:20 +0200 > From: david.planella@ubuntu.com > To: schumifer@hotmail.com > CC: app-review-board@lists.ubuntu.com > Subject: Re: [Vote] Postman > > Al 06/10/12 08:35, En/na Ed . ha escrit: > > Hi David, > > > > I've had a quick look at flickr > > (http://www.flickr.com/services/api/tos/) and apparently to use the > > flickr logo in an app, explicit written permission is required from > > them. A simple copyright adjustment will not suffice. > > > > I haven't looked into the other services but I wouldn't be surprised if > > their requirements are similar. > > > > Hi Ed, > > Thanks for looking into this. In that case, do you think you could > research how you can use each service's logos and contact the copyright > holders to get permission if necessary? > > Once that's been sorted we can then publish Postman on the Software Center. > > Alternatively, would it not be possible to create your own version of > the logos? > > Cheers, > David. > > > > > > >> Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 05:56:11 +0200 > >> From: david.planella@ubuntu.com > >> To: app-review-board@lists.ubuntu.com > >> CC: schumifer@hotmail.com > >> Subject: Re: [Vote] Postman > >> > >> Al 02/10/12 10:20, En/na Bhavani Shankar R ha escrit: > >> > On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Bhavani Shankar R > > <bhavi@ubuntu.com> wrote: > >> >> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:10 PM, David Planella > >> >> <david.planella@ubuntu.com> wrote: > >> >>> Al 21/09/12 00:24, En/na Andrew Mitchell ha escrit: > >> >>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:54:18AM +0200, David Planella wrote: > >> >>>>> Al 03/09/12 16:04, En/na Bhavani Shankar R ha escrit: > >> >>>>>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Ed . <schumifer@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >>>>>>> If I understood the Lintian error correctly, it should be > > fixed now. > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Regards, > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Ed > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> The short description seems good now > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Thanks Ed! > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Regards, > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Hi all, > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> In one of the monthly conversations with the Consumer Apps (CA) > > team to > >> >>>>> promote Open Source apps as banners in the Software Centre, I > > suggested > >> >>>>> having Postman as our new featured app. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> It currently simply needs 2 votes to be approved and then published. > >> >>>>> I've also noticed I can no longer find it in the MyApps queue > > [1]. Has > >> >>>>> it been deleted? > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> @ARB: could you help with the 2 remaining reviews and votes? > >> >>>>> @Ed: could you give us the URL to Postman in MyApps, or resubmit > > it if > >> >>>>> you've deleted it? > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Thanks. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Cheers, > >> >>>>> David. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> [1] https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/arb/ > >> >>>> > >> >>>> It looks like it's been resubmitted as > > https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/apps/1612/ > >> >>>> I've grabbed the source package from the PPA & it mostly looks > > good, the only > >> >>>> concerns I have at the moment are the copyright on the logos for > > the various > >> >>>> services, as they each have their own terms of use for how the > > logos are > >> >>>> used, and copyright on logos such as these should be detailed in > >> >>>> debian/copyright. > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >>> Thanks a lot Andrew. > >> >>> > >> >>> From your review, do you think you could you list which logos are > >> >>> missing copyright and how they should be listed in the > > debian/copyright > >> >>> file? > >> >>> > >> >>> Ed might or might not be familiar with Debian packaging, and I think a > >> >>> hint on how to do this would help unblocking the review and getting > >> >>> Postman into the Software Center. > >> >>> > >> >>> Thanks! > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> Hey David, > >> >> > >> >> All the logos after resubmission, should be listed according to their > >> >> licenses in d/copyright > >> >> > >> >> This link will help out on the same (I havent looked at the > >> >> resubmitted package though) > >> >> > >> >> > > http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#examples > >> >> > >> > > >> > Just took a look at the package in detail > >> > > >> > I think the logos and icons Andrew was referring to was (Please > >> > correct me if I'm wrong) > >> > > >> > -rw-r--r-- root/root 9743 2012-09-02 02:27 > >> > ./opt/extras.ubuntu.com/postman/share/postman/media/picasaLogo.png > >> > -rw-r--r-- root/root 3054 2012-09-02 02:27 > >> > ./opt/extras.ubuntu.com/postman/share/postman/media/ubuntuOneLogo.png > >> > -rw-r--r-- root/root 11115 2012-09-02 02:27 > >> > ./opt/extras.ubuntu.com/postman/share/postman/media/googlePlusLogo.png > >> > -rw-r--r-- root/root 1966 2012-09-02 02:27 > >> > ./opt/extras.ubuntu.com/postman/share/postman/media/flickrLogo.png > >> > > >> > Regarding g+ logo usage you can name the author name as google > >> > corporation and you can use something of this sort > >> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Google%2B_logo.png and can be stated > >> > under public domain I guess (in d/copyright) > >> > > >> > Same goes with Ubuntu one, flickr and picasa I guess. > >> > > >> > As I said earlier, Andrew: Please correct me if I'm wrong here > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > > >> > > >> > >> Ed, does this give you enough information on what files you should > >> provide copyright info for and how to do it? > >> > >> It'd be great if you could update the copyright info, so that we can > >> publish Postman and start promoting it in the Software Center. > >> > >> Let us know if you need help. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> David. > >> > > > -- > David Planella > Ubuntu Translations Coordinator > www.ubuntu.com / www.davidplanella.wordpress.com > www.identi.ca/dplanella / www.twitter.com/dplanella > </div></div> </div></body> </html>