<html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> On 10/07/15 22:25, Ralf Mardorf wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:20150710142514.67d15320@archlinux" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Btw. these are the Xubuntu related bug trackers: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/~xubuntu-bugs/+packagebugs">https://bugs.launchpad.net/~xubuntu-bugs/+packagebugs</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/">https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/</a> ( <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs">https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs</a> ) <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bugzilla.xfce.org/">https://bugzilla.xfce.org/</a> "When bugs are forwarded upstream, all users of the relevant software will benefit from the debugging, triaging and patching work carried out by bug triagers and developers. Once it has been determined that a bug is not caused by a change in Xubuntu, bugs can be forwarded to their respective upstream projects to be reviewed. For example, all appropriate Xfce bugs should be filed in the Xfce bug tracker. In addition, to track the status of the bug in Ubuntu, the bug in Launchpad should be linked with the upstream bug." - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://xubuntu.org/contribute/qa/">http://xubuntu.org/contribute/qa/</a> </pre> </blockquote> As a relatively newbie in Linux, (14months XUbuntu).... Would it be fair to sum it up then, that if I am not already directly engaged in helping debug some software, I am better off to ignore those auto-feedback popup requests and leave them to the experts? And if I want to be come involved in assisting, to go through the safer manual sites you mentioned above for bug-tracking??? <div class="moz-cite-prefix"> Rob </div> </body> </html>