<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> James Freer wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:8CE2BFFE53D6E2D-37A8-23B89@webmail-m142.sysops.aol.com" type="cite">Following the discussion on Replacing Gimp i was wondering if anyone uses Seamonkey. </blockquote> <raises hand enthusiastically> I do! I love it! It is the default choice in the ultra-light Puppy Linux distro too, because it is a nice lightweight combination that "acts like" Firefox and Thunderbird. Not over-developed, not slow nor heavy. Many Firefox extensions work in SeaMonkey as well. Mozilla took over the maintenance and development after Netscape let it go. It is much more like Firefox and Thunderbird now than the old Netscape Navigator/Communicator suite, but much eassier on resources than it's more popular siblings. They call it "Iceape" in Debian. <blockquote cite="mid:8CE2BFFE53D6E2D-37A8-23B89@webmail-m142.sysops.aol.com" type="cite"> Considering Xubuntu is meant for lighter/faster use or older PC i was wondering what folk thought and maybe this could be fed back to developers. I actually have a new machine but xubuntu is my choice mainly based on the minimal flavour. </blockquote> I might have asked for Midori as a web browser until I tried it. While it's certainly lightweight and fast, it crashes constantly and I have read that frequent crashes are an ongoing issue for many other Midori users as well. -Robin </body> </html>