<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 24/04/16 12:59, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:flocculant@gmx.co.uk">flocculant@gmx.co.uk</a>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:571CB527.1020309@gmx.co.uk" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
My position is that we only participate in the Final Beta.<br>
<br>
My reasoning being :<br>
<br>
<ul>
<li><span class="author-g-tkgsbwca10vmw9mc">1 - while we might
get a handful of people testing - they only see what's been
listed - rarely see new things listed</span></li>
<li><span class="author-g-tkgsbwca10vmw9mc">2 - </span><span
class="author-g-tkgsbwca10vmw9mc"><span
class="author-g-tkgsbwca10vmw9mc">users think it's
something to use for weeks and weeks - totally breaking
the use of the dailies</span></span></li>
<li><span class="author-g-tkgsbwca10vmw9mc">3 - </span><span
class="author-g-tkgsbwca10vmw9mc">more work in-house dealing
with both release notes on wiki and website</span></li>
<li><span class="author-g-tkgsbwca10vmw9mc">4 - we have to
provide someone now (read one of the release team - read me
;) ) and again to run the milestones with -release team</span></li>
</ul>
<p>While points 3 and 4 deserve mention - it is points 1 and 2
which are more important imo.<br>
</p>
<p>I don't believe that we gain much from doing the first beta and
it in fact is more likely to cost us.<br>
</p>
<p>regards<br>
</p>
<p>Kev<br>
</p>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
ah boo ... missed a bit out - which I thought about after reading
Pasi's reply.<br>
<br>
Given the 16.04.1 release and issues we need to deal with for that,
we'd be better to use the milestone period(s) to specifically target
applications and bugs.<br>
</body>
</html>