<html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 25/05/15 02:33, Istimsak Abdulbasir wrote: </div> <blockquote cite="mid:CAEtVGkvicVnP2yX+5hZe06q-3spnyeYeyWoci244YTCrHbVjnQ@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"> [snip] That should be mandatory to use the developing image like a production system. After all, the only way to really test it is to use. </blockquote> Some do, and can. Other's are not able to run a dev system this early. <blockquote cite="mid:CAEtVGkvicVnP2yX+5hZe06q-3spnyeYeyWoci244YTCrHbVjnQ@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"> Also, the current testcases we have for packages and iso are the same. They need to change or be upgrade with new procedures. We can test the packages over and over only to confirm what worked during the last development cycle. </blockquote> What's different about iso's this cycle? <blockquote cite="mid:CAEtVGkvicVnP2yX+5hZe06q-3spnyeYeyWoci244YTCrHbVjnQ@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"> Every cycle should have new upgraded testcases. Rather testing basic functionality, the testcases should really push the system. The objective should be to try and break the system then fix it. </blockquote> Right. And how do you think we can do that. If people don't run a 5 minute test what makes you think they would do more? The whole point of this thread is that there is next to no package testing done and thus the work that 2 or 3 people do every cycle is wasted. <blockquote cite="mid:CAEtVGkvicVnP2yX+5hZe06q-3spnyeYeyWoci244YTCrHbVjnQ@mail.gmail.com" type="cite">[snip] </blockquote> </body> </html>