<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 16/03/15 14:12, Pasi Lallinaho
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:5506E4CD.50701@shimmerproject.org" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 16/03/15 15:57, Elfy wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:5506E139.4050605@btinternet.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 16/03/15 13:38, Pasi Lallinaho
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:5506DCCE.9080407@shimmerproject.org"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hello team,
it's time to review and discuss the last section on the Xubuntu Strategy
Document that hasn't been updated during the "modern" Xubuntu times;
Seeds & Composition.
I've attached both the current and the new, proposed version to this
message.
The proposed version has been mostly drafted with Unit193 and has
briefly gone through Sean and Simon.
Time to discuss.
Cheers,
Pasi
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
I can almost ack that as it is ... <br>
<br>
One point only - I've never bothered to mention previously, but
if we're re-working it then I will now.<br>
<br>
Imagine that there is an application - that would be just be the
best thing since sliced bread, but no-one's bothered about
translations - at all. Only available in English.<br>
<br>
Assuming that all other points are ok.<br>
<br>
Does<br>
<br>
* Localization. Does the application have translations in the
most commonly used languages?<br>
<br>
or the new<br>
<br>
* Localization<br>
<br>
mean that no-one gets the package?<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Neither of this means that we can't include the package.
Localization is probably one of the easiest things to fix as well.
Lowering resource consumption is a completely different beast.<br>
<br>
As the document says, it's an aspect to be considered, not
something that alone is a reason not to include or not include the
package. The big picture of a package is more important than one
of the aspects.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
This is exactly why I said<br>
<br>
<blockquote> Assuming that all other points are ok.<br>
</blockquote>
Having ignored that point you've neatly sidestepped my concern ;)<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:5506E4CD.50701@shimmerproject.org" type="cite">
[snip]<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Pasi Lallinaho (knome) » <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://open.knome.fi/">http://open.knome.fi/</a>
Leader of the Shimmer Project » <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://shimmerproject.org/">http://shimmerproject.org/</a>
Ubuntu member, Xubuntu Website lead » <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://xubuntu.org/">http://xubuntu.org/</a></pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>