<html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 07/02/14 20:52, Richard Elkins wrote: </div> <blockquote cite="mid:52F54786.6030508@gmail.com" type="cite"> <meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> I should also add that the upgrade testing from 12.04.3 to 14.04.latest-at-that-time was rather pristine. I tried both an ISO image upgrade and one via `update-manager -c -d`. Very predictable and stable results. So, a bit of documentation word-smithing in the release notes for 14.04 may be sufficient. I'd also like to see other Xubuntu QA and developer folks also try out these two upgrade methods on Precise to Trusty before April and report their testing results in the usual place for upgrade testing: 64-bit: <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/308/builds/57247/testcases">http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/308/builds/57247/testcases</a> 32-bit: <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/308/builds/57248/testcases">http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/308/builds/57248/testcases</a> Anyone have a different perspective? Richard </blockquote> I'd not have thought so :) Once we get to Beta 1 then I would expect to have been asking people to be looking at upgrades. Elfy <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- Ubuntu Forum Council Member Xubuntu QA Lead</pre> </body> </html>