<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Jim Campbell wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:cc5454021001130910l36645658lcf61b7bdffd9f664@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Pasi
Lallinaho <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:open@knome.fi">open@knome.fi</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<div>
<div class="h5">Dave Morley wrote:
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
<pre>Jim out of curiosity what does epiphany use in comparison?
</pre>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
Or midori.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
We would have to look at those, but given the lack of extensions and
keyboard shortcuts for Epiphany, and the newness of Midori (have you
tried opening gmail in Midori? It reverts to the standard-html gmail
interface, and requiring sites to interface with Midori as if they were
interfacing with Safari shouldn't be something we should go with for an
LTS).<br>
<br>
I don't mean that as a knock against Midori. I have the Midori PPA
installed, and use it with some frequency. It's under really active
development, and it is a great project, but I don't think it would be
ready for use as the default browser in a release. <br>
<br>
Jim<br>
</blockquote>
I agree. I can't even open Gmail in Midori.<br>
<br>
We would like to have know the memory usage differences just for
curiosity, maybe for Lucid+1/2. I'm really interested in getting Midori
in at some point.<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Pasi Lallinaho
Xubuntu Marketing Lead
Web-designer, graphic artist
IRC: knome @ freenode
</pre>
</body>
</html>