<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 05/02/2008, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jani Monoses</b> <<a href="mailto:jani@ubuntu.com">jani@ubuntu.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
> It appears all Xubuntu developers are also users, and have their<br>> preferences as users, which they would like to see satisfied when they<br>> are acting as developers. Now it appears that there is a major choice to<br>
> be made: In case you cannto have both, is user-friendly-ness/stability<br>> more important or efficiency/lightweight-ness? Why not ask the users?<br><br>that is not really the choice. As I said the lightweightness issue is<br>
mostly a red herring in the cases of apps people have been changing.<br>Only for the absolutely broken apps did we introduce gnome counterparts,<br>the others have gnome in the name but are gtk only (hello Jerome, please<br>
run an ldd once in a while before coming up with bits of wisdom along<br>the lines of 'things have gnome in their names therefore they are to be<br>used in gnome')<br><br>Jani</blockquote><div><br>if this keeps going on like this, there will be a forking in xubuntu-land... which is bad as there are way too few people developing xubuntu already<br>
<br>i see a lot of people (a lot in this case means the majority from the posts i have read on this list) wanting back lightweight programs... and i see a few (or one) who wants to go all out with xUBUNTU<br><br>too bad... very sad... but that is what i see<br>
</div><br></div><br>