I don't recall there being a discussion either. I believe Lionel simply modified the seeds. Cheers, Cody <div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 31, 2008 9:16 AM, Vincent <<a href="mailto:imnotb@gmail.com">imnotb@gmail.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div><div class="Ih2E3d">On 31/01/2008, Jani Monoses <<a href="mailto:jani@ubuntu.com" target="_blank">jani@ubuntu.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> I was about to propose using the plain goffice, gnumeric and evince and stop maintaining the gtk only patches or start moving them upstream, when I saw the recent changes which revert back to gtk only for a few apps. I think using unmaintained, incomplete or immature apps is a mistake. What was the reasoning behind the move, for each separate package? When I switched to some gnome apps during Gutsy I argued on the list for the benefits for each package in part. I saw no such thread this time, althogh I may have missed a meeting.</blockquote></div><div> Neither can I recall such a thread, and I'm not sure whether there've actually been any meetings recently. I'm curious as to the reasoning too :) </div> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">thanks Jani </blockquote></div> -- Vincent -- xubuntu-devel mailing list <a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel</a> </blockquote></div> -- Cody A.W. Somerville