Wow. I'm really disappointed in the tone of your reply Jérôme. Is there any reason you felt it necessary to be so condescending and rude? Furthermore, could you please provide a link to either the mailing list thread or the IRC meeting that occurred where this was discussed? Although I don't recall this being discussed as a team , my memory can be as spotty as the next person. <br>
<br>As one of the Xubuntu-team members, I apologize Jani for the rude reply.<br><br>Have a nice day,<br><br>Cody A.W. Somerville<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 31, 2008 11:59 AM, Jérôme Guelfucci <<a href="mailto:jerome.guelfucci@gmail.com">jerome.guelfucci@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">This has been discussed between the active members of the Xubuntu<br>Team. Answers to your various questions:<br>
<br>- we don't have special patches for this, patches have already been<br>pushed upstream and we are just using different build options.<br>- if we find the time to maintain it, why should you all care ?<br>- it makes the desktop lighter, and we don't miss any key feature<br>
<br>And finally, I don't see why this is a problem, if you really care<br>about this, come and contribute more :)<br><br>Bye,<br><br>Jérôme<br><br>On Jan 31, 2008 4:49 PM, Cody A.W. Somerville<br><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">
<<a href="mailto:cody-somerville@ubuntu.com">cody-somerville@ubuntu.com</a>> wrote:<br>> I don't recall there being a discussion either. I believe Lionel simply<br>> modified the seeds.<br>><br>> Cheers,<br>
><br>> Cody<br>><br>><br>><br>> On Jan 31, 2008 9:16 AM, Vincent <<a href="mailto:imnotb@gmail.com">imnotb@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>
> ><br>> ><br>> > On 31/01/2008, Jani Monoses <<a href="mailto:jani@ubuntu.com">jani@ubuntu.com</a>> wrote:<br>> > > I was about to propose using the plain goffice, gnumeric and evince and<br>
> > > stop maintaining the gtk only patches or start moving them upstream,<br>> > > when I saw the recent changes which revert back to gtk only for a few<br>> apps.<br>> > > I think using unmaintained, incomplete or immature apps is a mistake.<br>
> > > What was the reasoning behind the move, for each separate package?<br>> > > When I switched to some gnome apps during Gutsy I argued on the list for<br>> > > the benefits for each package in part.<br>
> > ><br>> > > I saw no such thread this time, althogh I may have missed a meeting.<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Neither can I recall such a thread, and I'm not sure whether there've<br>
> actually been any meetings recently. I'm curious as to the reasoning too :)<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > > thanks<br>> > > Jani<br>> > ><br>> ><br>> > --<br>> > Vincent<br>
> > --<br>> ><br>> > xubuntu-devel mailing list<br>> > <a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>> > <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel</a><br>
> ><br>> ><br>><br>><br>><br>> --<br>> Cody A.W. Somerville<br>> --<br>> xubuntu-devel mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel</a><br>><br>><br><br>--<br>xubuntu-devel mailing list<br><a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel</a><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Cody A.W. Somerville