<div>did anybocy know some web site that offer free ship it software...</div>
<div>send the list to my email at <a href="mailto:danish91@gmail.com">danish91@gmail.com</a> <br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/15/07, <b class="gmail_sendername"><a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel-request@lists.ubuntu.com">xubuntu-devel-request@lists.ubuntu.com</a></b> <<a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel-request@lists.ubuntu.com">
xubuntu-devel-request@lists.ubuntu.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Send xubuntu-devel mailing list submissions to<br> <a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
</a><br><br>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel</a><br>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
<br> <a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel-request@lists.ubuntu.com">xubuntu-devel-request@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br><br>You can reach the person managing the list at<br> <a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel-owner@lists.ubuntu.com">
xubuntu-devel-owner@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br><br>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>than "Re: Contents of xubuntu-devel digest..."<br><br><br>Today's Topics:<br><br> 1. Considering Totem instead Gxine (Jani Monoses)
<br> 2. Re: Considering Totem instead Gxine (Vincent)<br> 3. Re: Considering Totem instead Gxine (Jani Monoses)<br> 4. Re: Considering Totem instead Gxine (Vincent)<br> 5. Re: Considering Totem instead Gxine (Jani Monoses)
<br> 6. Re: Considering Totem instead Gxine (Giuseppe Torelli)<br> 7. Re: Considering Totem instead Gxine (Robert McWilliam)<br> 8. Re: Considering Totem instead Gxine (Ghostvirus)<br><br><br>----------------------------------------------------------------------
<br><br>Message: 1<br>Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:13:48 +0200<br>From: Jani Monoses <<a href="mailto:jani@ubuntu.com">jani@ubuntu.com</a>><br>Subject: Considering Totem instead Gxine<br>To: <a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">
xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:fce1ed$alf$1@sea.gmane.org">fce1ed$alf$1@sea.gmane.org</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br><br>Hello,<br><br>I have been thinking lately of switching over to Totem for the following
<br>reasons besides the generic ones that were mentioned in the GNOME apps<br>thread.<br><br>- it is friendlier than gxine<br>- we get another package co-maintained with Ubuntu lessening our bug triage<br>- its dependencies are in already (although that was not a maneuver to
<br>get here!)<br>- according to the threads here and the forum poll, gxine seems to be<br>one of the top apps that are being switched out from a default install.<br>The alternative is usually vlc or mplayer but we cannot include those
<br>- has a nicer firefox plugin<br><br>Totem can use either gstreamer or libxine as a backend, here are the<br>pros and cons I know<br><br>totem-gstreamer<br>- gstreamer is the one used in Ubuntu so the maintenance argument applies
<br>- gstreamer has integrated the codec wizard that downloads missing<br>codecs when a certain media being played needs them<br>- pidgin in xubuntu already depends on libgstreamer<br><br>totem-xine<br>- we keep the same functionality as with gxine only with a nicer GUI
<br>- has better DVD support than gstreamer<br><br><br>well thought out and constructive comments welcome, regardless of their<br>being for or against this change :)<br><br>thanks<br>Jani<br><br><br><br><br>------------------------------
<br><br>Message: 2<br>Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:45:16 +0200<br>From: Vincent <<a href="mailto:imnotb@gmail.com">imnotb@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: Considering Totem instead Gxine<br>To: "Xubuntu Development Discussion" <
<a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a>><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:749ebd440709140645m74bdaf59of074842033e11b66@mail.gmail.com">749ebd440709140645m74bdaf59of074842033e11b66@mail.gmail.com
</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br>On 14/09/2007, Jani Monoses <<a href="mailto:jani@ubuntu.com">jani@ubuntu.com</a>> wrote:<br>><br>> Hello,<br>><br>> I have been thinking lately of switching over to Totem for the following
<br>> reasons besides the generic ones that were mentioned in the GNOME apps<br>> thread.<br>><br>> - it is friendlier than gxine<br>> - we get another package co-maintained with Ubuntu lessening our bug<br>
> triage<br>> - its dependencies are in already (although that was not a maneuver to<br>> get here!)<br>> - according to the threads here and the forum poll, gxine seems to be<br>> one of the top apps that are being switched out from a default install.
<br>> The alternative is usually vlc or mplayer but we cannot include those<br>> - has a nicer firefox plugin<br>><br>> Totem can use either gstreamer or libxine as a backend, here are the<br>> pros and cons I know
<br>><br>> totem-gstreamer<br>> - gstreamer is the one used in Ubuntu so the maintenance argument<br>> applies<br>> - gstreamer has integrated the codec wizard that downloads missing<br>> codecs when a certain media being played needs them
<br>> - pidgin in xubuntu already depends on libgstreamer<br>><br>> totem-xine<br>> - we keep the same functionality as with gxine only with a nicer GUI<br>> - has better DVD support than gstreamer<br>><br>
><br>> well thought out and constructive comments welcome, regardless of their<br>> being for or against this change :)<br><br><br>Even if Totem would be found unsuitable, using an alternative for Gxine is a<br>good idea in my opinion, I don't think *anyone* actually uses it...
<br><br>Anyway, I think if Gstreamer is already pulled in and also has the codecs<br>installation dialog, it is the preferred choice. But then again, I never<br>play DVD's, so I'm a bit biased and I don't know exactly what's wrong with
<br>playing DVD's with Gstreamer.<br><br>The biggest objection I have against Totem is that it is labelled "Totem<br>Movie Player" while it is actually also the default for music files, so it's<br>actually a "Media Player", but well...
<br><br>thanks<br>> Jani<br>><br>><br><br>--<br>Vincent<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/attachments/20070914/b2d6a580/attachment-0001.htm">
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/attachments/20070914/b2d6a580/attachment-0001.htm</a><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 3<br>Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:17:13 +0200<br>From: Jani Monoses <
<a href="mailto:jani@ubuntu.com">jani@ubuntu.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: Considering Totem instead Gxine<br>To: <a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:fce559$nsq$1@sea.gmane.org">
fce559$nsq$1@sea.gmane.org</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed<br><br>> Anyway, I think if Gstreamer is already pulled in and also has the<br>> codecs installation dialog, it is the preferred choice. But then again,
<br>> I never play DVD's, so I'm a bit biased and I don't know exactly what's<br>> wrong with playing DVD's with Gstreamer.<br><br>I think playing works but subtitles and menus do not.<br>><br>
> The biggest objection I have against Totem is that it is labelled "Totem<br>> Movie Player" while it is actually also the default for music files, so<br>> it's actually a "Media Player", but well...
<br>><br><br>Ubuntu has rhythmbox for music, I suppose that's the reason<br><br>Jani<br><br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 4<br>Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:20:15 +0200<br>From: Vincent <
<a href="mailto:imnotb@gmail.com">imnotb@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: Considering Totem instead Gxine<br>To: "Xubuntu Development Discussion" <<a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
</a>><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:749ebd440709140720r2f99f12dtcf2d6ea1f9db9c46@mail.gmail.com">749ebd440709140720r2f99f12dtcf2d6ea1f9db9c46@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
<br><br>On 14/09/2007, Jani Monoses <<a href="mailto:jani@ubuntu.com">jani@ubuntu.com</a>> wrote:<br>><br>> > Anyway, I think if Gstreamer is already pulled in and also has the<br>> > codecs installation dialog, it is the preferred choice. But then again,
<br>> > I never play DVD's, so I'm a bit biased and I don't know exactly what's<br>> > wrong with playing DVD's with Gstreamer.<br>><br>> I think playing works but subtitles and menus do not.
<br><br><br>That sounds like quite a big problem, but again: someone who plays DVD's<br>often should elaborate on that.<br><br>><br>> > The biggest objection I have against Totem is that it is labelled "Totem
<br>> > Movie Player" while it is actually also the default for music files, so<br>> > it's actually a "Media Player", but well...<br>> ><br>><br>> Ubuntu has rhythmbox for music, I suppose that's the reason
<br><br><br>Yeah, but I recall when I tried Ubuntu Feisty when you double-clicked an<br>MP3-file, Totem would open...<br><br>Jani<br>><br>><br>> --<br>> xubuntu-devel mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">
xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel</a><br>><br><br><br><br>--<br>Vincent<br>-------------- next part --------------
<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/attachments/20070914/183dbc00/attachment-0001.htm">https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/attachments/20070914/183dbc00/attachment-0001.htm
</a><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 5<br>Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:42:45 +0200<br>From: Jani Monoses <<a href="mailto:jani@ubuntu.com">jani@ubuntu.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: Considering Totem instead Gxine
<br>To: <a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:fce6l5$tfv$1@sea.gmane.org">fce6l5$tfv$1@sea.gmane.org</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
<br><br>Vincent wrote:<br>><br>><br>> On 14/09/2007, *Jani Monoses* <<a href="mailto:jani@ubuntu.com">jani@ubuntu.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:jani@ubuntu.com">jani@ubuntu.com</a>>><br>> wrote:<br>
><br>> > Anyway, I think if Gstreamer is already pulled in and also has the<br>> > codecs installation dialog, it is the preferred choice. But then<br>> again,<br>> > I never play DVD's, so I'm a bit biased and I don't know exactly
<br>> what's<br>> > wrong with playing DVD's with Gstreamer.<br>><br>> I think playing works but subtitles and menus do not.<br>><br>><br>> That sounds like quite a big problem, but again: someone who plays DVD's
<br>> often should elaborate on that.<br><br>I use totem-xine for precisely that reason.<br><br>><br>> ><br>> > The biggest objection I have against Totem is that it is labelled<br>> "Totem
<br>> > Movie Player" while it is actually also the default for music<br>> files, so<br>> > it's actually a "Media Player", but well...<br>> ><br>><br>> Ubuntu has rhythmbox for music, I suppose that's the reason
<br>><br>><br>> Yeah, but I recall when I tried Ubuntu Feisty when you double-clicked an<br>> MP3-file, Totem would open...<br><br>quite possible, I remember similar things but assumed my system was<br>messed up.
<br>Jani<br><br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 6<br>Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:37:20 +0200<br>From: "Giuseppe Torelli" <<a href="mailto:colossus73@gmail.com">colossus73@gmail.com</a>
><br>Subject: Re: Considering Totem instead Gxine<br>To: "Xubuntu Development Discussion" <<a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a>><br>Message-ID:<br> <
<a href="mailto:c2ea3aba0709140937y10f4de88x30791086017595f6@mail.gmail.com">c2ea3aba0709140937y10f4de88x30791086017595f6@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br><br>On 9/14/07, Jani Monoses <
<a href="mailto:jani@ubuntu.com">jani@ubuntu.com</a>> wrote:<br>> The alternative is usually vlc or mplayer but we cannot include those<br><br>Why? I do use vlc and it works perfectly. It playseverything:<br>flv,avi,mpg,asf,wav,ogg,mp3 etc etc. and it supports also DVD menus.
<br>--<br>Colossus<br>Xarchiver, a Linux GTK+2 only archive manager - <a href="http://xarchiver.xfce.org">http://xarchiver.xfce.org</a><br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 7<br>Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:41:39 +0100
<br>From: Robert McWilliam <<a href="mailto:rmcw@allmail.net">rmcw@allmail.net</a>><br>Subject: Re: Considering Totem instead Gxine<br>To: <a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
</a><br>Message-ID: <20070914174139.03f06243@uxelecas><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII<br><br>On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:37:20 +0200<br>"Giuseppe Torelli" <<a href="mailto:colossus73@gmail.com">
colossus73@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br>> On 9/14/07, Jani Monoses <<a href="mailto:jani@ubuntu.com">jani@ubuntu.com</a>> wrote:<br>> > The alternative is usually vlc or mplayer but we cannot include<br>
> > those<br>><br>> Why? I do use vlc and it works perfectly. It playseverything:<br>> flv,avi,mpg,asf,wav,ogg,mp3 etc etc. and it supports also DVD menus.<br><br>Because it includes support for everything, including formats that are
<br>patented and require royalties to be paid to distribute software to<br>support them in some countries.<br><br>________________________________________________________<br>Robert McWilliam <a href="mailto:rmcw@allmail.net">
rmcw@allmail.net</a> <a href="http://www.ormiret.com">www.ormiret.com</a><br><br>Of all the things I've lost I miss my mind the most.<br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 8<br>Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:54:41 -0400
<br>From: Ghostvirus <<a href="mailto:theghostvirus@gmail.com">theghostvirus@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: Considering Totem instead Gxine<br>To: "Xubuntu Development Discussion" <<a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">
xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a>><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:fba84300709140954l7f73938fyf850079d7bf35461@mail.gmail.com">fba84300709140954l7f73938fyf850079d7bf35461@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
<br><br>On 9/14/07, Jani Monoses <<a href="mailto:jani@ubuntu.com">jani@ubuntu.com</a>> wrote:<br>><br>> Hello,<br>><br>> I have been thinking lately of switching over to Totem for the following<br>> reasons besides the generic ones that were mentioned in the GNOME apps
<br>> thread.<br>><br>> - it is friendlier than gxine<br>> - we get another package co-maintained with Ubuntu lessening our bug<br>> triage<br>> - its dependencies are in already (although that was not a maneuver to
<br>> get here!)<br>> - according to the threads here and the forum poll, gxine seems to be<br>> one of the top apps that are being switched out from a default install.<br>> The alternative is usually vlc or mplayer but we cannot include those
<br>> - has a nicer firefox plugin<br>><br>> Totem can use either gstreamer or libxine as a backend, here are the<br>> pros and cons I know<br>><br>> totem-gstreamer<br>> - gstreamer is the one used in Ubuntu so the maintenance argument
<br>> applies<br>> - gstreamer has integrated the codec wizard that downloads missing<br>> codecs when a certain media being played needs them<br>> - pidgin in xubuntu already depends on libgstreamer<br>>
<br>> totem-xine<br>> - we keep the same functionality as with gxine only with a nicer GUI<br>> - has better DVD support than gstreamer<br>><br>><br>> well thought out and constructive comments welcome, regardless of their
<br>> being for or against this change :)<br>><br>> thanks<br>> Jani<br>><br>><br>> --<br>> xubuntu-devel mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
</a><br>> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel</a><br>><br><br>I'm sorry, but trading one useless app for another useless one sounds
<br>pointless to me. How many people honestly use Totem for their regular video<br>watching? I don't know anyone that uses it. Everyone inevitably installs VLC<br>and/or MPlayer, especially if they're using Xfce. Obviously those can't be
<br>included by default, but why switch gxine out for Totem? I fail to see how<br>Totem is better to use. It's hardly any more user-friendly than gxine. "It's<br>already in Ubuntu" seems to be the only reasoning behind this...
<br><br>Just my $0.02.<br><br>Ghostvirus<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/attachments/20070914/7ea21503/attachment.htm">
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/attachments/20070914/7ea21503/attachment.htm</a><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>--<br>xubuntu-devel mailing list<br><a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">
xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br><a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel</a><br><br><br>End of xubuntu-devel Digest, Vol 25, Issue 10<br>
*********************************************<br></blockquote></div><br>