On 8/23/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jani Monoses</b> <<a href="mailto:jani.monoses@gmail.com">jani.monoses@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
> Xarchiver has its issues, but if it's really so bad, then why do most<br>> Xfce-based distros package it by default? Even Zenwalk, which has a<br>> rather high standard when it comes to packaging apps by default,
<br>> packages Xarchiver by default.<br><br>So I take it you use xarchiver and are satisfied with it?<br><br>Jani<br><br><br>--<br>xubuntu-devel mailing list<br><a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
</a><br><a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel</a><br></blockquote></div><br>I use Xarchiver exclusively for my archiving needs. Which isn't to say I put it through heavy, rigorous use, but so far it's done what I need it to, and I've never experienced any errors.
<br><br>As long as Giuseppe continues to work on it and squash bugs as soon as possible, I see no reason why Xarchiver won't improve in the near future.<br><br>Ghostvirus<br>