<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid20070227102107.GA13677@wmid.amu.edu.pl.edu"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Dnia Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:07:07AM +0100, napisale(a)s:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Jelle de Jong wrote:</pre>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Why I don't (yet) like Claws Mail:
- No default html rendering of emails (possible with a plugin and manual
selection)
- No possibility to compose a html mail
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Those are advantages!
Really, html mail is only useful as a "this is spam" flag :)
</pre>
</blockquote>
I know many of you see this as an advantage, but I'd really like to add
a html (bold, italics, font size) signature to my business mail.
Accentuating words and/or sentences with bold or italics is also a must
(for me and a lot of other users). using *bold* and /italics/ just
doesn't make sense to everybody... Some might even think of that as
going 10 years back in time...<br>
<br>
If you don't like html mail, you can always disable it... It's what the
majority of computer users want, and IMHO that's html based email
displaying and composing...<br>
<blockquote cite="mid20070227102107.GA13677@wmid.amu.edu.pl.edu"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">- Ugly default icons
- Really annoying alternating colors in the folder list
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Isn't this just a matter of the gtk theme?
</pre>
</blockquote>
Yes and no, I haven't found a theme which doesn't have the alternating
colored rows instead of a plain background, so I think it's in the
widget... (non-developer speaking)<br>
<br>
I've tried Claws for a while, but the above drove me back in the arms
of Thunderbird...<br>
<br>
<br>
-H-
</body>
</html>