How about Ice Weasel and Ice Dove.  :)  (Sorry, I couldn't resist.) I agree with the sentiments of others on this.  From what I've seen, Xubuntu is largely being considered for systems running 128mb of RAM and up.  Systems with those specs should be able to run Firefox and Thunderbird, even if a bit slowly.  Though Xubuntu's strength is that it is relatively light and fast, systems with less than 128mb of RAM may likely be better off running a different distro. Jim <div>On 12/6/06, Oblio <<a href="mailto:apa.chioara@gmail.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">apa.chioara@gmail.com </a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">> Has anyone tried Skipstone? > <a href="http://www.muhri.net/skipstone/" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)"> http://www.muhri.net/skipstone/</a> > It aims to be a light and fast gecko browser, in GTK with few > dependencies. > > John Poorly mantained and developed apps should be out of the question for any self respecting distro. That puts out Links-hacked, Dillo, Skipstone, and a lot of mail clients. Why? Simple. A program which doesn't do what it's supposed to do (for example Dillo has no CSS suport, AFAIK), or can't be repaired if a problem occurs (Links-hacked), is worse than a problem that does everything required, albeit sloooowly. 0.5 > 0. Something is better than nothing :) -- xubuntu-devel mailing list <a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)"> xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel </a> </blockquote></div> -- <a href="mailto:jwcampbell@gmail.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)"> jwcampbell@gmail.com</a>