On 11/7/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Eero Tamminen</b> <<a href="mailto:oak@helsinkinet.fi">oak@helsinkinet.fi</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi,<br><br>On Tuesday 07 November 2006 20:01, Jani Monoses wrote:<br>> Answering to the selling point question: I said it's 'one of the selling<br>> points' definitely not the main one.<br><br>Another side of this is the thin-client usage.
<br>Not just low CPU and RAM usage, but lower X traffic.</blockquote><div><br>Do you think xfce causes less traffic than gnome?<br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
> This said we still have no idea what causes the memory use regression (if<br>> any) and what the new requierements are. I'll try to get around testing<br>> today on a real machine.<br><br>Could you post some data of this to the list for discussion?
<br></blockquote></div><br>The data will probably be the smallest amount of mem I succeeded booting with. It'd be helpful if people who<br>actually encountered the bug provide this data though...<br><br>You're also free to grab the iso and test yourself, that way you have all the data you may need ;)
<br>Jani<br>