Now that you mention it, I do agree it should be an off-site thing, and we could link to it on <a href="http://Xubuntu.org">Xubuntu.org</a> <div>On 11/3/06, Brian Lawson <<a href="mailto:brianrlawson@yahoo.com">brianrlawson@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> After reading some responses, I wanted to clarify what I envisioned <a href="http://xubuntuguide.org">xubuntuguide.org</a> to be.  I hope for it to be very much like <a href="http://ubuntuguide.org">ubuntuguide.org</a>.  If you haven't checked it out, go there and scroll through it a bit…it will help give some context to this question. It is very much an "unofficial" Ubuntu site, which is why I hesitate to attach it to the official (and Canonical-supported) site.  For example, <a href="http://ubuntuguide.org">ubuntuguide.org</a> contains instructions for adding repositories that contain unsupported, non-free, or possibly illegal packages.  While extremely useful, I don't know that the official site would want to be responsible for this content. But on the other hand, I don't want to dilute or fracture any momentum the Xubuntu project has going…I want to respect the wishes of the main team, contributors, and users. -Brian -- xubuntu-devel mailing list <a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel </a> </blockquote></div> -- Vincent