xubuntu-devel Digest, Vol 92, Issue 20

Wed May 29 00:41:00 UTC 2013

I've already started working on Xfce4 Terminal manual testcase and assigned
myself to it in Launchpad.

Hopefully, between it, the daily iso's testcases in UbuntuQA and my
professional work, I'll have it ready for merging in a couple of weeks.

Best regards.
Slickymaster

On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:52 AM, <xubuntu-devel-request at lists.ubuntu.com>wrote:

> Send xubuntu-devel mailing list submissions to
>         xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         xubuntu-devel-request at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         xubuntu-devel-owner at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of xubuntu-devel digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Testcases (Elfy)
>    2. Re: Testcases (Jackson Doak)
>    3. Re: Testcases (Pasi Lallinaho)
>    4. Re: Testcases (Elfy)
>    5. Re: Testcases (Elfy)
>    6. Re: Testcases (Jackson Doak)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 09:12:43 +0100
> From: Elfy <ub.untu at btinternet.com>
> To: xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: Testcases
> Message-ID: <51A0727B.5000204 at btinternet.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> I'm going to be reviewing the testcases we have and looking at creating
> them for those that we don't.
>
> There is a list of testcases that are still to do  [1]
>
> The question is - what needs doing first, if in fact any do ;)
>
> So - suggestions from the team as to which testcases you'd like to see -
> which I guess is dictated by which apps we're likely to want to make
> sure get tested, perhaps the default apps.
>
>
> Kev
>
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/+bugs?field.tag=todo
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 18:31:43 +1000
> From: Jackson Doak <noskcaj at ubuntu.com>
> To: Xubuntu Development Discussion <xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: Testcases
> Message-ID:
>         <CA+K2i_1mV-b39__PZaBpTdXFrQAcK=
> awYStmWOoB15VFyg6UUg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I think we could use a testcase for Xchat.
> Are we going to try and make some Autopilot tests for Xubuntu?
>
>
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Elfy <ub.untu at btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm going to be reviewing the testcases we have and looking at creating
> > them for those that we don't.
> >
> > There is a list of testcases that are still to do  [1]
> >
> > The question is - what needs doing first, if in fact any do ;)
> >
> > So - suggestions from the team as to which testcases you'd like to see -
> > which I guess is dictated by which apps we're likely to want to make sure
> > get tested, perhaps the default apps.
> >
> >
> > Kev
> >
> > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/**ubuntu-manual-tests/+bugs?**
> > field.tag=todo<
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/+bugs?field.tag=todo>
> >
> >
> > --
> > xubuntu-devel mailing list
> > xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/**mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel<
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel>
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/attachments/20130525/a056fda4/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 12:42:23 +0300
> From: Pasi Lallinaho <pasi at shimmerproject.org>
> To: Xubuntu Development Discussion <xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: Testcases
> Message-ID: <51A0877F.10607 at shimmerproject.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 25/05/13 11:12, Elfy wrote:
> > I'm going to be reviewing the testcases we have and looking at
> > creating them for those that we don't.
> >
> > There is a list of testcases that are still to do  [1]
> >
> > The question is - what needs doing first, if in fact any do ;)
> >
> > So - suggestions from the team as to which testcases you'd like to see
> > - which I guess is dictated by which apps we're likely to want to make
> > sure get tested, perhaps the default apps.
> >
> >
> > Kev
> >
> > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/+bugs?field.tag=todo
> >
> >
>
> I would start with the packages that are in our default installation and
> exclusive to Xubuntu (eg. not in other flavors or Ubuntu). In addition,
> we could give the Xfce packages the same priority, even if Ubuntu Studio
> is using them as well.
>
> Pasi
>
> --
> Pasi Lallinaho (knome)                      ? http://open.knome.fi/
> Leader of Shimmer Project and Xubuntu       ? http://shimmerproject.org/
> Graphic artist, webdesigner, Ubuntu member  ? http://xubuntu.org/
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 10:47:22 +0100
> From: Elfy <ub.untu at btinternet.com>
> To: xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: Re: Testcases
> Message-ID: <51A088AA.10302 at btinternet.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
>
> On 25/05/13 09:31, Jackson Doak wrote:
> > I think we could use a testcase for Xchat.
> I can see that it's on the list, but does it need to be tested as a
> seperate thing, pidgin gets tested during the normal iso testing and to
> be honest xchat has been pretty much rock solid for me for years.
>
> I suppose it's more core apps that we need to generate testcases for first.
>
> > Are we going to try and make some Autopilot tests for Xubuntu?
> Can you think of any that will help Xubuntu.
>
> We don't want to be doing them for the sake of it.
> > On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Elfy <ub.untu at btinternet.com
> > <mailto:ub.untu at btinternet.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     I'm going to be reviewing the testcases we have and looking at
> >     creating them for those that we don't.
> >
> >     There is a list of testcases that are still to do  [1]
> >
> >     The question is - what needs doing first, if in fact any do ;)
> >
> >     So - suggestions from the team as to which testcases you'd like to
> >     see - which I guess is dictated by which apps we're likely to want
> >     to make sure get tested, perhaps the default apps.
> >
> >
> >     Kev
> >
> >     [1]
> >     https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/+bugs?field.tag=todo
> >
> >
> >     --
> >     xubuntu-devel mailing list
> >     xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:
> xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com>
> >     https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu Forum Council Member
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/attachments/20130525/955838a9/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 10:49:05 +0100
> From: Elfy <ub.untu at btinternet.com>
> To: Pasi Lallinaho <pasi at shimmerproject.org>
> Cc: Xubuntu Development Discussion <xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: Testcases
> Message-ID: <51A08911.304 at btinternet.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 25/05/13 10:42, Pasi Lallinaho wrote:
> > On 25/05/13 11:12, Elfy wrote:
> >> I'm going to be reviewing the testcases we have and looking at
> >> creating them for those that we don't.
> >>
> >> There is a list of testcases that are still to do  [1]
> >>
> >> The question is - what needs doing first, if in fact any do ;)
> >>
> >> So - suggestions from the team as to which testcases you'd like to
> >> see - which I guess is dictated by which apps we're likely to want to
> >> make sure get tested, perhaps the default apps.
> >>
> >>
> >> Kev
> >>
> >> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/+bugs?field.tag=todo
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I would start with the packages that are in our default installation
> > and exclusive to Xubuntu (eg. not in other flavors or Ubuntu). In
> > addition, we could give the Xfce packages the same priority, even if
> > Ubuntu Studio is using them as well.
> >
> > Pasi
> >
> That was what I was thinking.
>
> This has crossed with a reply to noscaq- in which I'm not sure that apps
> we know are solid eg xchat should be looked at until others have been done.
>
> Kev
>
> --
> Ubuntu Forum Council Member
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 19:52:00 +1000
> From: Jackson Doak <noskcaj at ubuntu.com>
> To: Xubuntu Development Discussion <xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: Testcases
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CA+K2i_1wD7mwGdefOBV+Js-wrpZF5UDUpWvcWfW8S4KMsP41sg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> you're right, Xchat is rock solid.
> I think automating the two post-install tests would help
>
>
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Elfy <ub.untu at btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> >  On 25/05/13 09:31, Jackson Doak wrote:
> >
> > I think we could use a testcase for Xchat.
> >
> > I can see that it's on the list, but does it need to be tested as a
> > seperate thing, pidgin gets tested during the normal iso testing and to
> be
> > honest xchat has been pretty much rock solid for me for years.
> >
> > I suppose it's more core apps that we need to generate testcases for
> first.
> >
> >  Are we going to try and make some Autopilot tests for Xubuntu?
> >
> > Can you think of any that will help Xubuntu.
> >
> > We don't want to be doing them for the sake of it.
> >
> >  On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Elfy <ub.untu at btinternet.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm going to be reviewing the testcases we have and looking at creating
> >> them for those that we don't.
> >>
> >> There is a list of testcases that are still to do  [1]
> >>
> >> The question is - what needs doing first, if in fact any do ;)
> >>
> >> So - suggestions from the team as to which testcases you'd like to see -
> >> which I guess is dictated by which apps we're likely to want to make
> sure
> >> get tested, perhaps the default apps.
> >>
> >>
> >> Kev
> >>
> >> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/+bugs?field.tag=todo
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> xubuntu-devel mailing list
> >> xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ubuntu Forum Council Member
> >
> >
> > --
> > xubuntu-devel mailing list
> > xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/attachments/20130525/7899103f/attachment.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> xubuntu-devel mailing list
> xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
>
>
> End of xubuntu-devel Digest, Vol 92, Issue 20
> *********************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/attachments/20130529/c2651165/attachment.html>