We're finally up on the schedule at summit.ubuntu.com
gridcube at gmail.com
Fri May 10 00:09:27 UTC 2013
If its of any relevance, later would be better for me. But i have little to
say or add besides my hopes about what the future of xubuntu should look
2013/5/9 Pasi Lallinaho <pasi at shimmerproject.org>
> On 09/05/13 21:07, Stephen Michael Kellat wrote:
> > We're currently showing on the schedule at summit.ubuntu.com in the
> following time blocks next Wednesday:
> > 1600-1700 UTC -- Forward-Looking Issues
> > 1800-1900 UTC -- Software
> > 1900-2000 UTC -- Development & Milestone Participation
> > I'm actually going to have to get an in-person appointment shifted to
> another day to be able to work with that schedule.
> > Do we want to stick with that or do we want to go with the one block per
> night after 2000 UTC over the three nights of UDS?
> > Stephen Michael Kellat
> All on Wednesday? I'm not sure if that's a good idea. One session per
> day would be better for me, or even 1/2 sessions split to two days.
> As I said before, earlier hours are better for me, but I can organize
> things so that I will be able to take part from 20UTC as well. Maybe it
> would be a good compromise to do some of the sessions earlier, some
> later. What do other people think of the times? Earlier or later better?
> Also, Micah can't attend vUDS. We should look into scheduling one more
> session for week 21, preferably sooner than later in the week.
> Pasi Lallinaho (knome) » http://open.knome.fi/
> Leader of Shimmer Project and Xubuntu » http://shimmerproject.org/
> Graphic artist, webdesigner, Ubuntu member » http://xubuntu.org/
> xubuntu-devel mailing list
> xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the xubuntu-devel