ub.untu at btinternet.com
Sun Dec 15 13:03:05 UTC 2013
On 14/12/13 16:19, Richard Elkins wrote:
> I agree with you about "Extras" (barely bother....."). However, a
> newbie following forum advice about how to get the latest
> DVD/CSS/Java/whatever might install ubuntu-restricted-extras and get a
> 404. That is a lousy way of finding out no-can-do, yes? It's also a
> weird surprise for non-newbies.
> Assumption: ubuntu-restricted-extras will eventually be permitted for a
> given release. True?
> My (cheap) suggestion, then, would be one of the following:
> 1 - Clone the Extras from the previous release (Saucy, in this case).
> 2 - If Extras are not yet desirable during a testing cycle, create an
> empty Extras repo.
> 3 - If Extras are not yet desirable during a testing cycle, create
> ubuntu-restricted-extras in the testing repo that simply causes a simple
> notification to that effect to be shown during installation attempts.
> I don't care which approach is used or another one that I haven't
> thought of. I just do not like errno=2 or 404 surprises.
*-restricted-extras is in Multiverse.
Extra's is things like acroread -
Dealing with any of your suggestions wouldn't be anything that we can do.
Ubuntu Forum Council Member
Xubuntu QA Lead
More information about the xubuntu-devel