13.04 Beta 2 issues -- libudev0 missing, seamonkey 2.17.1 (statically linked 32 bit binary) probs

[Stephen Michael Kellat]

Okay, at this point it appears that libudev0 is not in the archive at all so that is a bigger issue.  It looks like it was possibly superseded by libudev1.  See: http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libudev0

As to Seamonkey, I'm going to have to take a pass as that is outside my wheelhouse.

Stephen Michael Kellat


On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:55:35 +0200
Florian Daniel Otel <florian.otel at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
> 
> First, sorry if this was / is addressed somehow (first post to the
> list). If yes, feel free to point me to the right resources.
> 
> I'm now evaluating 13.04 Beta2 (Desktop amd64) and have the following
> issues:
> 
> 1) libudev0 missing
> 
> That library is used by e.g. Google Chrome but I'm not able to find
> that package.
> 
> 2) Seamonkey 2.17.1
> 
> I've been trying to use seamonkey on my system but for some reason
> launching it returns ENOENT:
> 
> user at Xubuntu1304:~$ strace /usr/local/seamonkey/seamonkey
> execve("/usr/local/seamonkey/seamonkey",
> ["/usr/local/seamonkey/seamonkey"], [/* 48 vars */]) = -1 ENOENT (No
> such file or directory)
> dup(2)                                  = 3
> fcntl(3, F_GETFL)                       = 0x8002 (flags O_RDWR|
> O_LARGEFILE) fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0620, st_rdev=makedev(136,
> 5), ...}) = 0 mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|
> MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x7f70ee809000
> lseek(3, 0, SEEK_CUR)                   = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek)
> write(3, "strace: exec: No such file or di"..., 40strace: exec: No
> such file or directory
> ) = 40
> close(3)                                = 0
> munmap(0x7f70ee809000, 4096)            = 0
> exit_group(1)                           = ?
> 
> user at Xubuntu1304:~$ file /usr/local/seamonkey/seamonkey
> /usr/local/seamonkey/seamonkey: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel
> 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for
> GNU/Linux 2.6.9, stripped
> 
> 
> The very same version works perfectly fine on 12.04.  System is
> updated according to the latest available packages.  What am I
> missing ?
> 
> 
> Please let me know (Cc: me directly, I'm not subscribed to the list)
> if there is any additional info needed.
> 
> Thanks in advance for any help,
> 
> Florian