A few words on Santiago Roland's suggestions

[Darshak Parikh]

Bingo! :)
On Dec 2, 2012 5:14 PM, "Pasi Lallinaho" <pasi at shimmerproject.org> wrote:

> On 12/02/2012 01:41 PM, Darshak Parikh wrote:
> >
> > @Pasi, I understand. Yes, I understand that the default apps were
> > chosen as default after giving much thought to it. And although it
> > wasn't directly apparent at first, I understand that the developers
> > have a good reason for including those. And what with the current
> > situation of the ISO and all these dependencies, it seems that not
> > much can be done in that area besides updations.
> >
> > But there's one thing that I would seriously love, if it's possible. A
> > lightweight alternative to USC. Something like the Lubuntu one. Is it
> > feasible?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Darshak
> >
> >
>
> I agree USC isn't ideal either, but at the moment, it's working for most
> of the new users. (As I said before, advanced users can simply
> install/use any package manager they see best fit for them.)
>
> That has been discussed, and as soon as viable and working alternatives
> are around, we'll most probably compare them with USC and consider for
> inclusion.
>
> Pasi
>
> --
> Pasi Lallinaho (knome)                      » http://open.knome.fi/
> Leader of Shimmer Project and Xubuntu       » http://shimmerproject.org/
> Graphic artist, webdesigner, Ubuntu member  » http://xubuntu.org/
>
>
> --
> xubuntu-devel mailing list
> xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/attachments/20121202/67a1ed0f/attachment.html>