Xubuntu LTS proposal
cyber.druif at gmail.com
Thu Dec 8 00:58:02 UTC 2011
I'm not sure how LTS are defined with Canonical/Ubuntu, but as far as I
know will Lubuntu (the youngest addition in the flavor rack) will not have
a LTS. Simply because of lacking manpower.
With metta, Chris
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 21:38, Charlie Kravetz <cjk at teamcharliesangels.com>wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 12:26:40 -0800
> Elizabeth Krumbach <lyz at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Micah Gersten <micahg at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > > So, as discussed around UDS time, we need to make an official request
> > > for Xubuntu to be labeled as an LTS release.
> > > Here are what I think we can sanely commit to:
> > >
> > > 3 yr LTS
> > Since Ubuntu is switching to 5 year LTS Desktop, are the derivatives
> > required to as well to be considered LTS? Or can we have a 3 year LTS?
> Per the spec written at UDS and referenced by Micah, we can have 3 year
> or 5 year LTS. It is a decision made by the Project Lead when applying
> for LTS status.
> - --
> Charlie Kravetz
> Linux Registered User Number 425914 [http://counter.li.org/]
> Never let anyone steal your DREAM. [http://keepingdreams.com]
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> xubuntu-devel mailing list
> xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the xubuntu-devel