Amendment to the Xubuntu Strategy Document - Final request for comments

[Charlie Kravetz]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 07:08:22 -0600
Charlie Kravetz <cjk at teamcharliesangels.com> wrote:

> 
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:27:56 +0300
> Jarno Suni <jarno.ilari.suni at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > I find that too bureaucratic. It is better to communicate in the
> > project and let your deeds speak for themselves. I think Xubuntu
> > should not be a one man's project, but aim at common interest, ease to
> > configure to your personal needs. Less is more.
> > 
> 
> You find having a leader that can actually make a decision bureaucratic
> or you find selecting a leader bureaucratic? 
> 
> I fail to see the connection between having a project lead and "one
> man's project". There is a huge difference, and they are not the same.
> 

Perhaps I should also have stated that this is not a debate about
whether or not to have a project leader, but only a way to pick that
leader. The Strategy Document guides the governance of Xubuntu. It
already states there will be a project leader. That isn't going to be
changed. 

- -- 
Charlie Kravetz 
Linux Registered User Number 425914          [http://counter.li.org/]
Never let anyone steal your DREAM.           [http://keepingdreams.com]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJORSywAAoJEFNEIRz9dxbAcTkIAJjWOVlq7zjuk6Oe2NHiDmFc
0EELf6qMa1330y+HcSMqTSELbt5igN/2SV6ufrfJrxVGV3flpnK5RE1pkp7tmkvr
blOIzWFFHtz/5i58uZguFpqGspO+B5pudjpJNFXmOCUFlIuD7oWc80hAOGVmSUpc
NO0xyig61oMGMVtA5pukg+01YURavDfryOYk6m2Jnv0C22H8CFgQTHvxorxZLKup
gmTuDVKYQn9smE0UjeqnDJR9xwoIhXGop+J8juji58KzsLTCCtxnEVPfEHa0BXlU
v58zTh/4isjjWHSe4nWsI2ifdXdP2lSX9GfW17sjrxngnB3/4ddbO4P6SLEFr+E=
=1d6o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----