Replacing Firefox with Google Chrome
davmor2 at davmor2.co.uk
Wed Jan 13 17:15:06 UTC 2010
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 19:12 +0200, Pasi Lallinaho wrote:
> Jim Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Pasi Lallinaho <open at knome.fi>
> > wrote:
> > Dave Morley wrote:
> > >
> > > Jim out of curiosity what does epiphany use in comparison?
> > >
> > >
> > Or midori.
> > We would have to look at those, but given the lack of extensions and
> > keyboard shortcuts for Epiphany, and the newness of Midori (have you
> > tried opening gmail in Midori? It reverts to the standard-html gmail
> > interface, and requiring sites to interface with Midori as if they
> > were interfacing with Safari shouldn't be something we should go
> > with for an LTS).
> > I don't mean that as a knock against Midori. I have the Midori PPA
> > installed, and use it with some frequency. It's under really active
> > development, and it is a great project, but I don't think it would
> > be ready for use as the default browser in a release.
> > Jim
> I agree. I can't even open Gmail in Midori.
> We would like to have know the memory usage differences just for
> curiosity, maybe for Lucid+1/2. I'm really interested in getting
> Midori in at some point.
Jim a lot of the stuff that was broken I believe has now been fixed in
epiphany. (I could be wrong)
Seek That Thy Might Know
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the xubuntu-devel