Xubuntu team direction
open at knome.fi
Mon Jan 4 09:51:24 UTC 2010
Cody A.W. Somerville wrote:
> Sorry for taking so long to reply. I've been thinking quite a bit
> about this and have been waiting for the appropriate time to jump in.
> *General gist*: I think a council *could* be good for Xubuntu.
> However, its membership should be limited to 3 people due to the small
> size of our community (if we can't find consensus now, putting us all
> on a council isn't going to give us consensus either); it can grow
> later as necessary. Ultimately, this change should be mostly a
> transparent one and not a harbinger of great change or divergence from
> the Ubuntu community and processes. In fact, I feel this change should
> instead aim to bring greater consistency, stability, and most
> importantly longevity to our project.
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Pasi Lallinaho <open at knome.fi
> <mailto:open at knome.fi>> wrote:
> Jim Campbell wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 2:46 AM, Pasi Lallinaho <open at knome.fi
>> <mailto:open at knome.fi>> wrote:
>> Now, where did this discussion go?
>> It appears as though it went on vacation. It has to come back to
>> work eventually, though!
>> People seemed to like the council-type approach; what's next?
>> I think it would be a good idea to revisit the document that Cody
>> put together and see how it would need to be modified to suit a
>> council-type approach. I can give this a try. I'll let the
>> group know if I have questions as I put things together.
> Yeah, this sounds good. Maybe we should also briefly revise the
> general direction stuff and make any modifications to those as
> well if we feel they need to be changed.
> Agreed. The document is indeed in need of an update.
>> has obejctions? Should we first propose this to the Community
>> (or some place else) or just take the new governance into use?
>> Once that is done, I think we should have a meeting to approve
>> it. We could at least have that as an agenda item for our
>> meeting (which we need to have anyway). I think that there is a
>> general consensus around this for now, but we should formalize it.
> I share this feeling of consensus. Whats left to do is to determine if
> we're truly ready for this step and to what degree.
> Once we formalize our intent as a community to move in this direction,
> we will need to go before the community council to have our updated
> strategy document ratified.
>> Cody, can
>> you be our link to the other councils or whatever, as you
>> seem to know
>> them best?
>> If we all approve of the change as a group, I think we could
>> forward it on to the council so that they know what we're doing,
>> but I am not so sure it would require their seal of approval. As
>> long as we are comfortable with what we're doing, I think the
>> community council would be ok with it. Ultimately, I don't think
>> it will make a huge difference in how we operate as long as
>> things get done.
> I could think so as well, but you never know... :)
> We are a Ubuntu project and to be fully recognized as a council with
> delegated authority from the community council we will require the
> community council's approval. However, thats the easy part. Coming up
> with a structure that will ultimately provide healthy leadership and
> have any sort of longevity will require careful planning and
> discussion between key stakeholders first.
>> What's the situation with the technical team leadership?
>> Cody, Lionel?
>> I think we still need to address this.
> The intention of the community leadership page was to give
> recognizability to the individuals who have organically grown into
> different leadership roles within the Xubuntu community. Its the
> person and not the title that permits these individuals to influence
> the project in the ways that they do. If anything, Lionel has only
> been increasingly more and more involved with the technical direction
> and operations of Xubuntu and so IMHO is the tech lead for Xubuntu
> regardless if we says so or not :-).
> If Lionel wishes to continue in this capacity, he is more than welcome
> to recognized as such IMHO.
>> What's the situation with Michael? Can we remove Joszef's
>> name from the
>> leaders list - he's still not appeared from the mist.
>> I don't know what the situation is with Michael. As for Joszef,
>> I am of the opinion that we could remove his name from the
>> leaders list. If he wanted to come back and contribute more, he
>> would be welcome to do so.
> Okay. Let's do this parallel to the next meeting. Maybe we should
> also remove Michael from the leaders list or at least put his name
> on parenthesis if he doesn't show up in the meeting or before it?
> Joszef has made his intentions clear that he has left Xubuntu for
> other endeavors.
> Michael should be contacted to gauge his interest.
Michael confirmed in IRC that he should be marked inactive - "ENOTIME".
>> To make Lucid be as good and stable as possible, I think we
>> also should
>> have a developer meeting soonish. If we can get the
>> governance things
>> sorted before or while the meeting, GREAT!
>> I agree! I've put together a doodle poll to check everyone's
>> availability for a team meeting. Please record what times will
>> work for you using the link below. Hopefully the times will work
>> for people, but I can set up new times if I've picked times that
>> don't work for your corner of the world. Keep in mind that this
>> will be the best Xubuntu team meeting ever.
> Voted. :)
> What I gathered from this mail we need to cover at least the
> following topics (read: AGENDA):
> 1) Review the Xubuntu strategy document
> - Modify to suit the council-type approach (Jim will look into
> this before the meeting)
> - Briefly revise the overall strategy and modify if needed
> 2) Approve (and forward) the new Xubuntu governancy
> - See 1), will need to have the final form ready in the document
> so we can approve it!
> I don't think we'll be able to come to a final draft ready to begin
> the ratification process after just one meeting. However, I'm sure
> we'll be able to make good progress.
> Its important that whatever we come up with conforms to
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CommunityCouncil/Delegation or a really good
> reason why it shouldn't.
> 3) Review the leaders list
> 4) Other topics
> - Artwork for Lucid (Shimmer/polish Albatross)?
> - Default applications for Lucid?
> - [Insert your "other topic" here]
> Happy New Years!
> Cody A.W. Somerville
> Software Systems Release Engineer
> Foundations Team
> Custom Engineering Solutions Group
> Canonical OEM Services
> Phone: +1-781-850-2087
> Cell: +1-613-401-5141
> Email: cody.somerville at canonical.com
> <mailto:cody.somerville at canonical.com>
Xubuntu Marketing Lead
Web-designer, graphic artist
IRC: knome @ freenode
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the xubuntu-devel