Karmic Spec: Thunderbird Vs. Claws (Michele Mor)

Robert Freeman-Day presgas at gmail.com
Fri May 15 15:06:21 UTC 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Simon,

I (and the others you have influenced to try it) will await the fix to
be implemented.

Robert

Simon Steinbeiß wrote:
> Robert,
> 
> As I expected there's a bugreport about this (and it seems a fix was released):
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/claws-mail-extra-plugins/+bug/358608
> 
> Regards,
> Simon
> 
> 
> On Fri, 15 May 2009 09:53:22 -0400
> Robert Freeman-Day <presgas at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Simon,
> 
> I just tried Claws and some plugins from the repos and the version of
> Claws seems to be newer than the plugins built (Ubu 9.04).  Did you run
> into that during testing?  If this situation is common, unfortunately I
> don't think it should be considered as a default client.  Looks real
> nice so far though!
> 
> Robert
> 
> Simon Steinbeiß wrote:
>>>> Robert Freeman-Day wrote:
>>>>> I will say there is key setup and management for the enigmail plugin
>>>>> (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Xubuntu/Specifications/Karmic/ThunderbirdVsClaws#Encryption).
>>>>> If you go to the OpenPGP menu, you should see an item called "Key
>>>>> Management" and I personally found it quite useful for dipping my toe
>>>>> into GPG.
>>>> True, thanks for pointing that out. I even realised that the plugin is in the universe
>>>> repositories. Maybe I'll update the comparison.
>>>>
>>>>> That being said, you have convinced me to make another go of Claws.
>>>> Then I guess all the work was worth it :)
>>>>
>>>> Michele Mor wrote:
>>>>> since this comparison was made in order to decide which application would be part of
>>>>> Karmic, I think you should have tried Thunderbird 3 (beta).
>>>> Well, to be honest I there's no consistent behaviour in Ubuntu as to when they
>>>> include a beta release. It's not yet in the Karmic repos and as far as I can see
>>>> there's not even a debian-package, only a binary one (which I tested). I just don't
>>>> think it's the same to test an early beta release from a binary than to test a
>>>> package that has already undergone some testing.
>>>> So in a way I think it would have been less fair to compare Thunderbird 3 beta2 with
>>>> Claws stable.
>>>>
>>>> (Btw, what would be the significant changes from version 2 to 3 that you think are
>>>> really messing up the comparison?)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Simon
>>>>

- --
________

Robert Freeman-Day

https://launchpad.net/~presgas
GPG Public Key:
http://keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBA9DF9ED3E4C7D36
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkoNhO0ACgkQup357T5MfTZmKgCglrMAz7WMh/uZLMZPDKcUlXY6
Y28An2fOt/3GbovTlfic1ZIzfvkwnhFS
=MaLC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the xubuntu-devel mailing list