inclusion of firefox 3
imnotb at gmail.com
Tue Mar 4 19:04:36 UTC 2008
On 3/4/08, vidd <vidd at crosslink.net> wrote:
> I dont feel empowered to change bug status ... as i said, im no
You don't need to be a developer to confirm bugs ;-)
You can confirm it if
> Can you reproduce the bug yourself?
If developers know which bugs are not isolated issues then they can
concentrate on the most important ones first.
> > According to that forum thread you linked to, the problem is actually
> > a problem with Java.
> I think the issue is a combination of Java, and the way firefox handles
> > Hava you tried installing Epiphany or Firefox 2 and install Java?
> no, Epiphany requires too much gnome for my meager machines, and I didnt
> get around to monkeying with firefox-2 (I had done so much mettling on
> the system, that I formated to a pristeen condition, and found the
> firefox3 cure)
OK, because you might find that it doesn't work there either so then this
wouldn't really be a reason not to include Fx 3.
> > Thanks
> > vidd
> > --
> > Vincent
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the xubuntu-devel