seed changes + Squeeze
imnotb at gmail.com
Sat Mar 1 13:52:48 UTC 2008
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Jim Campbell <jwcampbell at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Jani Monoses <jani at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > Ok it looks like both the old and current packages are on the CDs
> > LiveCD
> > http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily-live/20080228/hardy-desktop-i386.manifest/screen
> > Alternate
> > http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily/20080228/hardy-alternate-i386.list
> > They seem to have both gnome-screensaver and xscreensaver, squeeze and
> > file-roller.
> > Maybe some of this caused the recent overflow of alternate ISOs ?
> It also looks like we're including the "onBoard" and "onBoard Settings"
> applications. Those were just recently added, too, and may be contributing
> to the oversized ISOs.
> By the way, I've tried out the updated version of Squeeze. I extracted
> some archives of different formats, and created a new archive. It worked
> just fine.
> If others agree that it works well, I would like for us to give Squeeze a
> shot as the default archive application (vs. file-roller). Could others
> test the updated version and report back on their experiences?
I unpacked a .tar.gz archive with Squeeze yesterday on Alpha 5 and
experienced no problems.
(Hardy looks nice, btw, if only for the decrease in panel size...
totem-gstreamer and Firefox 3 are great too.)
> Thanks to Lionel and Jérôme for following-up on Squeeze's bug 187928 and
> getting it fixed/updated.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the xubuntu-devel