Fonts
jmak
jozmak at gmail.com
Tue Jul 8 00:02:49 UTC 2008
On 7/7/08, George Brooke <solar.george at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:16:54 +0200
> Jelle de Jong <jelledejong at powercraft.nl> wrote:
>
> > jmak wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > In order to produce a real high quality desktop environment every
> > > little detail counts, including fonts. There is an absolutely high
> > > quality font family that has been created for Goggle, called Droid.
> > > Ubuntu has been negotiating with Goggle to completely open-source
> > > them. If they succeed, the font family will be used on Ubuntu as
> > > default system fonts. They are mac quality fonts and look great on
> > > xubuntu too. If the negotiations succeed, we should also use them as
> > > default system fonts. Download and try them out. From here:
> > >
> > > http://damieng.com/blog/2007/11/14/droid-font-family-courtesy-of-google-ascender
> > >
> > > jmak
> > >
> >
> > Just curious but what's wrong with the liberation-fonts?
> >
> > Why don't we use them?
> >
> > https://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/
> >
> > http://damieng.com/blog/2007/05/17/red-hat-releases-liberation-fonts
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Jelle
> >
>
> There's been some discussion on the art mailing list and as a user
> (from the screen shots) I really can't see that either is hugely better
> than the other.
>
Look at the differences, in terms of resolution, clarity and screen
space economy.
http://img378.imageshack.us/img378/3581/fontsyh5.png
jmak
More information about the xubuntu-devel
mailing list