gnome apps

Cody A.W. Somerville cody-somerville at ubuntu.com
Thu Jan 31 15:49:09 UTC 2008


I don't recall there being a discussion either. I believe Lionel simply
modified the seeds.

Cheers,

Cody

On Jan 31, 2008 9:16 AM, Vincent <imnotb at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 31/01/2008, Jani Monoses <jani at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> >
> > I was about to propose using the plain goffice, gnumeric and evince and
> > stop maintaining the gtk only patches or start moving them upstream,
> > when I saw the recent changes which revert back to gtk only for a few
> > apps.
> > I think using unmaintained, incomplete or immature apps is a mistake.
> > What was the reasoning behind the move, for each separate package?
> > When I switched to some gnome apps during Gutsy I argued on the list for
> > the benefits for each package in part.
> >
> > I saw no such thread this time, althogh I may have missed a meeting.
>
>
> Neither can I recall such a thread, and I'm not sure whether there've
> actually been any meetings recently. I'm curious as to the reasoning too :)
>
> thanks
> > Jani
> >
>
> --
> Vincent
> --
> xubuntu-devel mailing list
> xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
>
>


-- 
Cody A.W. Somerville
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/attachments/20080131/96ec0d2b/attachment.html>


More information about the xubuntu-devel mailing list