New panel size

[jmak]

We have to figure out how to decrease the actual panel size. Because
as you said, decreasing the numbers only scales the icons. The xfce
panel behaves differently than the gnome panel. But the panel size
should be the same both on the top and bottom.

On Nov 8, 2007 12:42 PM, Cody A.W. Somerville
<cody-somerville at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> It seems to me that increasing the panel size does not in fact increase the
> size of the panels. In instead increases the size of the icons and when the
> icons reach a critical mass, the panel resizes to accomedate. This is why
> I've increased the top panel to 38 and the bottom panel to 24. I feel that
> the top panel needs to be larger than the bottom panel due to the widgets
> used there (it looks disgusting when it is smaller - especially the
> applications menu because the icon we use is png and does not scale well).
>
>
>
> On Nov 8, 2007 1:34 PM, Vincent <imnotb at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi list,
> >
> > So, I think about everybody agrees Xubuntu's panels can be grealy
> decreased in size. I thought I'd turn it into a separate thread to avoid
> confusion.
> >
> > So: is there still anyone who thinks the panels should keep their current
> size, and if not, what should the new width be?
> >
> > --
> > Vincent
> >
> > --
> > xubuntu-devel mailing list
> > xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Firefox (www.getfirefox.com) -- A browser you can trust
> --
> xubuntu-devel mailing list
> xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
>
>



-- 
http://jozmak.blogspot.com/