Tue Aug 21 10:20:19 BST 2007
have problems with Xarchiver. I really don't think it's as bad as Jani
By the same token, obviously Guiseppe needs to be open to bug reports and
usability suggestions. He's obviously still working on Xarchiver, so
hopefully improvements are forthcoming.
Just my $0.02.
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 8/23/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jani Monoses</b> <<a href="mailto:jani.monoses at gmail.com">jani.monoses at gmail.com</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
><br>>> Q: If file-roller didn ot have gnome deps would you still oppose the switch?<br>><br>> I'm opposing to ANY gnome lib based apps, File-roller is one of them.<br><br>Reread the question.<br><br>Jani
<br><br><br>--<br>xubuntu-devel mailing list<br><a href="mailto:xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com">xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com</a><br><a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
</a><br></blockquote></div><br>Wow, this is turning into a big mud-slinging free-for-all. Are Jani and Guiseppe the only two people subscribed to this list? Seems that way sometimes.<br><br>Xarchiver has its issues, but if it's really so bad, then why do most Xfce-based distros package it by default? Even Zenwalk, which has a rather high standard when it comes to packaging apps by default, packages Xarchiver by default.
<br><br>From a quick search on the Ubuntu forums, it doesn't seem like many people have problems with Xarchiver. I really don't think it's as bad as Jani claims.<br><br>By the same token, obviously Guiseppe needs to be open to bug reports and usability suggestions. He's obviously still working on Xarchiver, so hopefully improvements are forthcoming.
<br><br>Just my $0.02.<br><br>Ghostvirus<br>
More information about the xubuntu-devel