Commercial Support references on the Xubuntu website

Giuseppe Torelli colossus73 at
Thu Aug 23 08:30:35 UTC 2007

On 8/23/07, Jani Monoses <jani.monoses at> wrote:
> out of curiosity is that an archive you created for this test or actually occured in day to day work?
> Actually do not answer, I know it's the former. Artificial benchmarks.

Artificial words!

> you need to actually care about xubuntu more than xarchiver. Tough choice I know.
> A prove of that would be for you to send patches that optimize file-roller until it
> is as fast as you could get xarchiver.  Unlikely.

So why do you speak? Just for replying? Jani, Jani.

> No, I am saying it because your tone is inappropriate and not constructive.
> I understand, it is about your app(s), but admit it then.

My tone? is it not yours?

> Q: If file-roller didn ot have gnome deps would you still oppose the switch?

I'm opposing to ANY gnome lib based apps, File-roller is one of them.
Why should GNOME apps be included in Xubuntu if there are a bunch of
them included in Ubuntu? Why should users use Xubuntu if all of its
apps are already included in Ubuntu?
Because of XFCE?

You are transforming Xubuntu in a bloated copy of Ubuntu and you are
so stubborn not to understand this.

Xarchiver, a Linux GTK+2 only archive manager -

More information about the xubuntu-devel mailing list