more than 128 M needed for liveCD
cody.somerville at gmail.com
Wed Nov 8 18:25:02 UTC 2006
The alternative cd works fine. The live cd is the issue here. :)
On 11/8/06, Adam Miller <maxamillion at gmail.com> wrote:
> Again, you are referencing the Live cd, I want to know about the Alternate
> installation cd and success with it under lesser memory footprints under
> Precision is a fluid concept in a situation like this ... anything to the
> closest multiple of 32 or 64 would suffice.
> On 11/8/06, panshizhu at routon.com <panshizhu at routon.com > wrote:
> > xubuntu-devel-bounces at lists.ubuntu.com 写于 2006-11-08 07:14:17:
> > > Anyone with a test system able the check the lowest available specs
> > > for the alternate installation is? I'm just personally curious and
> > > lack the hardware. (actually plan to purchase one off ebay over the
> > > next month just to do testing on feisty with) Thanks.
> > >
> > > -Adam
> > How acurate do you want? Does it make any sense indicating something
> > like
> > "it require 134M memory" while nobody will have a computer with 134M
> > memory?
> > I'd tested it with my computer having 160M (128M+32M) and the Xubuntu
> > live
> > cd works. (In fact, the 160M even works with Kubuntu live cd afaik).
> > Will
> > anybody having a computer with memory between 128M and 160M?
> > So the thing may be: 128M with regression, with 160M it simply works.
> > --
> > Sincerely, Pan, Shi Zhu. ext: 2606
> > --
> > xubuntu-devel mailing list
> > xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
> --OpenPGP key: 5DBFA065--
> xubuntu-devel mailing list
> xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
Firefox (www.getfirefox.com) -- A browser you can trust
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the xubuntu-devel