Your comment on Xubuntu.org

Vincent imnotb at gmail.com
Thu Nov 2 10:55:39 GMT 2006


I think the comments are going fine if only we'd have captcha's so you did
not have to login...

And if you're admin: http://xubuntu.org/admin/comment

Newest messages at the top.

On 11/1/06, Adam Miller <maxamillion at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I completely agree as well. Also, is there some way i can view all new
> comments when logged into drupal?
>
> I also think we need to find some better means of bulletin board
> communication because the comments thing isn't going so well.
>
> -Adam
>
> On 11/1/06, Vincent <imnotb at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I completely I agree and did not plan putting it on the site ;)
> >
> > I do think we should put the new docs on the site, anywhere I can find
> > them? And is it possible to expand them? E.g. it could include something
> > on what packages to add for MP3 support.
> >
> > On 11/1/06, Jani Monoses < jani.monoses at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 11/1/06, Vincent <imnotb at gmail.com > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > http://xubuntu.org/news/website_live#comment-28
> > > >
> > > > The website for downloading Xubuntu packages website is not used too
> > > > much, as most people install new programs via the Synaptic program. If you
> > > > try that, you'll probably find that it is very easy in use, even easier than
> > > > the Windows .exe's.
> > > > Your comments on the names have been taken into account, we will
> > > > explicitly note that it is a codename at the site.
> > > >
> > > > Please bear in mind that e.g. download.com is not by Microsoft, it
> > > > is a third party site.
> > > >
> > > > Also, installing Automatix by default might bring legal issues, the
> > > > same as installing proprietary codecs by default.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I am not comfortable with endorsements of automatix or other 3rd party
> > > installers on xubuntu.org as they may cause problems for inexperienced
> > > users. They can still be found on the forums by those who really look for
> > > them. We get enough spurious (non-Xfce or strictly xubuntu) bugs in LP, I
> > > would not want to get signal/noise even lower by getting reports about
> > > broken packages only to find out it's due to the system not using only
> > > offciial repos.
> > > I know that was only a comment above, just want to make sure we don't
> > > get 3rd package manager howtos on the official site.
> > >
> > > thoughts?
> > >
> > > Jani
> > >
> > > --
> > > xubuntu-devel mailing list
> > > xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Vincent
> > --
> > xubuntu-devel mailing list
> > xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> -=:Max:=-
> --OpenPGP key: 5DBFA065--
> --
> xubuntu-devel mailing list
> xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
>
>
>


-- 
Vincent
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/attachments/20061102/c3351bda/attachment.htm 


More information about the xubuntu-devel mailing list