jari.rahkonen at pp1.inet.fi
Thu Nov 2 08:54:03 GMT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Matthew Kuiken kirjoitti:
> To toss in my 2 cents, I think any backporting should be done to the
> most recent version. The reason dapper has a long support life is not
> so that it can get all the latest features, but because it needs the
> stability and reliability that comes with tried and tested code.
> Backporting something with as many changes as the final XFCE will have
> probably runs counter to this philosophy, as just the act of backporting
> it will create many new bugs. The point of the long support life time
> is to fix security issues, and major bugs. The more changes that are
> made, the more chances there are for new bugs to be created, thus
> changes to the LTS should be exactly what is necessary, nothing more.
> Ubuntu will not change from Gnome 2.14 or from the 2.6.15 kernel for the
> entire three year period. I see no reason why Xubuntu should make a
> change that amounts to a kernel or gnome upgrade either.
I fully agree. An LTS release is only supposed to get critical bug fixes
and security updates. Anything else should go to Feisty (with backports
to Edgy in some cases).
- - Jari
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the xubuntu-devel