update_4

[Vincent]

I'd go for the marble one. And as for making people used to it, I think this
first really official release does not have to mean the artwork is going to
stay the same for years, I'd say going for artwork to be used over the
coming time could be started this release.

On 7/12/06, Jani Monoses <jani.monoses at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I agree with keeping the simple old logo, and making the new artwork
> better and still based on it.
>
> Jani
>
> On 7/12/06, Luzi Thoeny <lucius.antonius at gmail.com> wrote:
> > jmak wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Here there are two more versions of the logo.
> > >
> > > Chrome:
> > >
> > > http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/9778/greeterchrome3sp.png
> > >
> > > Marble:
> > >
> > > http://img123.imageshack.us/img123/4205/greetermarble2wt.png
> > >
> > > J. Mak
> >
> > I would personally prefer to stay with the previous logo. i don't think
> > the logo should change for every release, but should rather stay the
> > same - so that people can get used to it and recognize it. Neither
> > Ubuntu nor Kubuntu have changed their logos, as far as I  know.
> >
> > We had a pretty long discussion about the logo, and I think it's good we
> > settled on one, so why not just stay with it?
> >
> > luzi
> >
> > --
> > xubuntu-devel mailing list
> > xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
> >
>
> --
> xubuntu-devel mailing list
> xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
>



-- 
Vincent

http://getfirefox.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/attachments/20060712/532296a6/attachment.html>