Artwork update

[Vincent]

I think they look great now :D

On 12/22/06, jmak <jozmak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/21/06, Vincent <imnotb at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/21/06, jmak <jozmak at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 12/21/06, Vincent <imnotb at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12/21/06, jmak <jozmak at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On 12/21/06, Vincent < imnotb at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > They look very cool, just too bad the logo is plain again, I
> liked
> > the
> > > > > > glossy one...
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The logo was kept simple intentionally to contrast with the text
> part;
> > > > > the opposite how it was with edgy; there the logo image was
> glossified
> > > > > the text part was simplified.
> > > >
> > > > Why does it have to contrast with the text? Is there some usability
> > > > reasoning behind that or do you just like it?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Normally, there must be a hierarchy behind the various compositional
> > > elements. If visually everything is on the same level, it becomes
> > > confusing. This is just a basic compositional principle.
> >
> > Ah, right.  But can't the logo and name be looked at as one?
> >
>
> I gave a second thought to the matter and I replaced all artworks with
> the glossy logo. The text and the image have enough contrast, in term
> of colors so they still function well.
>
> --
> 2007 Calendar, Great Xmas gift
> http://www.lulu.com/content/512622
> http://jozmak.googlepages.com/
>
> --
> xubuntu-devel mailing list
> xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
>



-- 
Vincent
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/attachments/20061222/776523d9/attachment.html>